Back to Columns
09 May 2006
MAYOR'S E-COLUMN
COUNCIL FINANCES: PUTTING THINGS
RIGHT
Former district councilor Steve Palmer
has decided to reinvent history in his criticism of this council’s draft
2006-16 LTCCP, and our accompanying financial decisions. (‘Opinion’ 9
May)
In fact it was his council that botched the
2003 LTCCP and whose errors we are,
legislatively, required to correct. Don’t take our word for it: that
is also the opinion of the Office of the Auditor-General.
In fact the Audit
Office was not impressed with a great many aspects of Mr
Palmer’s
past council. We have received no less than four separate audit reports criticizing
aspects of the past council’s administration and policy. From IT to
the harbour, from the under-reporting of debt to the state of the council’s
financial management – my council inherited a mess.
Indeed the 2003
LTCCP that Mr Palmer helped shape should be seen as the fiction it is.
It underreported council debt, failed to put in place appropriate
asset management plans, and banked on optimistic forestry prices. When
it
later knew
those its forestry investments could not be counted on, it deliberately
withheld such information from the public.
By contrast the draft
2006 LTCCP has received prior Audit Office approval and has been
rigorously checked. The figures are accurate, the assets all
properly
accounted for, and the financial management both robust and professional.
That has been no mean feat.
Consequently, we have had to revise debt
projections and they will now peak at $64 million in 2010/11. The
cause of
that debt is threefold: the
stormwater/wastewater
project, the collapse of the council’s forestry investments, and
more professional asset management.
Obviously it is still too high for
our liking. But then so too are Wanganui’s
rates.
To that end, we provided a nil rates increase
last year and a projected 3% average increase this year – less
than the rate of inflation. A 3% rates increase over two years
is not simply remarkable.
It is the lowest in New Zealand.
We have also looked within - at places
that council can save ratepayers’ money.
We’ve cut $500,000 from the council’s corporate budget
and tasked the chief executive with restructuring senior and middle
management. We’ve
insisted that commercial operators pay the full cost of council services – and
not be subsidised by other ratepayers.
But a council cannot just be
about rates and finances. It must create a strong community by creating
assets and amenities that the people
want. Assets that
all the community can enjoy – not just the few.
We’ve
done that. Last year the people of Wanganui identified their No.1
priority as the Splash Centre extension. Their second choice was
the riverfront development, and their third, the upgrading of the
city’s footpaths. My
council has made the people’s priorities, our priorities.
Similarly, it will be democracy that guides
us on the soft water option. There is enormous public interest
in softening Wanganui’s
water supply. Our initial estimates are that for a $70 household
levy, the average household will save
$150 per year on electricity efficiencies and bathing/washing products
from having softer water. That $80 per household saving is equivalent
to an average 5% reduction
in rates.
On one thing, Stephen Palmer is right. This
new council does think differently to the last one.
It is more
professional, more insistent upon financial standards, more robust
in its policy delivery and its acts more decisively
and quicker.
It also
has a clean bill of health from its auditors. Little wonder that
the prestigious ‘National
Business Review’ recently suggested that all of New Zealand
should be following this council’s lead.
Michael Laws
Mayor
|